Debt Collection Strategy For Retail Fianance

Strategy is a plan; Strategy is a pattern in actions over time; Strategy is a position; and Strategy is perspective, that is, vision and direction.

Strategy bridges the gap between policy and tactics.

Effective collection Strategy should have a comprehensive approach which encompasses:

Automating work flows: Automation of work flows through dedicated collection system would help classify, allocate, prioritize, and assign accounts and maintain flexibility to respond to changing circumstances. This is estimated to reduce delinquency by 1-2%.

Monitoring Resource Performance: Measurement of efficiency and effectiveness of collectors, supervisors, business unit is very important. Dash board approach is good; system should provide on-line performance to all stakeholders, continuously and consistently. System based and systematic monitoring for course correction is estimated to reduce delinquency by 1% and reduce collection costs by 4-5%.

Improving performance of Debt Collection Agency (DCA): It is important to get better results and accountability from DCA handing delinquent and recovery cases. Letting DCAs to use collection system on web and seeking accurate and daily contact and collection details help improve recovery and achieve high liquidation rate. Alternatively, it helps shifting of the cases to more effective agencies.

Reporting to Credit Bureau: Lenders will have to supply accurate delinquency data on each default customer to Credit Bureau. This brings discipline in few customers and results in payment in full ; and ensures future payments on time.

Capturing contact details digitally:  It appears very easy; but it is the most difficult activity in the Debt Life cycle. There are a lot of constraints and resistance to get contact details recorded systematically and daily. Some field collectors have retained most information on delinquent customers in their diaries and the notes go with them when they leave. Currently, contact history is very important to grade delinquent accounts systematically for different actioning.

Let us discuss tactics for each of the following category.

I High Delinquent – High Risk ( DPD > 89 & Delinquency rate > 66% )	II Low Delinquent – High Risk ( DPD < 90 & Delinquency rate > 66% )
III High Delinquent – Low Risk ( DPD > 89 & Delinquency rate < 67%)	IV Low Delinquent – Low Risk ( DPD < 90 & Delinquency rate < 67% )

Strategy for Quadrant IV – LDLR

These accounts may be allotted to desk collection; desk collection is responsible for tele-calling and written communication.

Soft collection letter may be sent after each cheque bounce or a missed payment.  Each letter must positively bring focus on possible loss of credit rating with credit bureau, pointing out the benefit of saving penalty, late payment charges/ fees, etc. apart.   80% of default accounts with DPD less than 31 will be cured with a simple letter. This includes self cure. (We will discuss the content and tone of different collection letters in future blogs).

Calling may be scheduled for accounts with DPD exceeding 30. A tele-caller can effectively and must call 50-60 accounts a day including ‘pop-up’ and ‘Promise-To-Pay’ cases. They may cure a minimum 70% of allotted cases; accordingly resources may be planned and provided for. The resources must be well trained to be effective to collect, but still relate. Being low delinquent, relationship with these customers are important and may be handled in a way relationship is not affected at all.

Strategy for Quadrant II – LDHR

These accounts will have to be allocated to field collection. These accounts should not be allotted to DCAs for collection, as highly reliable details on these customers are required for quick ‘grading’.  Collectors must meet these customers and record accurate contact details focusing on “Ability and/or Intention to pay”.

Collection tactic for each of the following metric is as follows:

High Ability – High Intention	Low Ability – High Intention
High Ability – Low Intention	Low Ability – Low Intention

High Ability – High Intentio               :           collect money

Low Ability – High Intention             :           seek and get surrender of the asset

High Ability – Low Intention             :           repossess the asset

Low Ability – Low Intention             :           charge off and/or sell the account

Strategy for Quadrant III – HDLR

These accounts may be considered for allocation to Debt Collection Agency (who is a good DCA?). Alternatively, it may be allocated to field collectors. Most likely, many accounts here will be high on intention and low on ability. Economics of these customers may have started deteriorating in the recent past. Collection should be possible and seeking the surrender of asset may be considered as next option. The interface with this customer will have to still be customer centric and communication both ways need to be managed better.

Strategy for Quadrant I – HDHR

These accounts are very Low on intentions. These must be allocated to the most experienced field collectors or collection supervisors. Best way to realize any collection from these accounts is by repossession and sale of asset. It is advised not to repossess assets which are in non-saleable condition.

Losses can be only minimized if the sale of repossessed asset is done urgently and through robust process. Many a time, the process is subject to judicial review, when suit is filed for recovery. So, it is advisable to keep the record of the process and documents in customer files without fail.

In many cases, there would be difficulty in repossessing the assets. In such cases where the ability is high, legal proceedings must start immediately without wasting any time.                                                                    

Classify To Bring Focus

Delinquencies need to be classified appropriately to bring the right focus. Different institutions use different type of delinquency/ collection reports. Each has its advantage and disadvantages.

Some foreign banks use collection reports based on ‘exposure given default’ – EGD. This gives a list in descending order of exposure. Here, the focus is on accounts with high exposure. Obviously, they do not want loss per account to be huge. Here, classification does not reflect neither level of delinquency or level of risk.

Some NBFCs use collection reports based on ‘past due amount’. This gives a list in descending order of default amount or past due amount. There is no clarity on delinquency and risk levels.

Most MNC lenders use collection reports based ‘days past due’ – DPD. This gives a list in descending order of number of days accounts in default. One can get ‘months past due’ by dividing DPD by 30. Months past due gives number of installments overdue.  Similarly, many credit card lenders use ‘buckets’ generally representing different months past due, say first bucket to mean account with past due from 1-30 days. This certainly indicates the level of delinquency and not fully the level of risk. Yes, default accounts with high DPD tend to be high risk; it gets increasingly difficult to collect with an increase in DPD.

Then, how do we measure risk, delinquency level and classify them broadly based on delinquency and risk, to bring the right focus by allocating and assigning resources to mitigate losses?

It is important to have accounts classified in the following matrix.

I High Delinquency - High Risk	III Low Delinquency - High Risk
II High Delinquency - Low Risk	IV Low Delinquency - Low Risk

Collection reports rak ordered by delinquency rate would help classify, based on risk.

Delinquency rate is, as defined elsewhere in my blogs, the rate of amount past due as compared to amount billed so far for the contract.

Top 20% of accounts on the list are certainly high risk accounts; balance can be classified as low risk accounts. These can be further classified based on DPD. Accounts with DPD higher than 90 may be classified as high delinquent and remaining low delinquent.

Now, we have 4 quadrants which constitute Debt Lifecycle as follows:

I        High delinquent – High risk

II       High delinquent – Low risk

III      Low delinquent -  High risk

IV      Low delinquent – Low risk

It is clear that the focus needs to be on high risk accounts and more on Quadrant I accounts which are High delinquent – High risk. Different quadrants require different levels of curing like calling, field visits, repossession, agency collection, legal actions, etc.

Try them; you will see results. Losses will come down.

Collection analytic will help further classify to bring razor sharp focus; I will write on collection analytics on different pages in near future.